THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF
VERTEBRATES
MAMMALS: Elephant
African
elephant (photo by Dr. Ed Stevens) < go to CD
African
elephant (Loxodonta
africana) digestive tract (Stevens
&
Hume 1995)
Figure
2.1. Relationship between mass-specific metabolic rate (ml O2/g.h)
or
metabolic intensity and log of body mass for eutherian mammals ranging
from 6 g shrews to 1,300-kg elephants. Note the inverse relationship
between mass-specific metabolic rate and body mass. (From
Schmidt-Nielsen 1984). (CD Figure 3.1)

Figure 3.4. Skull of a South American Margay (Felis tigerina) and the mandibular
tooth of an Asian elephant. The elephant tooth has a weight about equal
to a telephone book, and the dark band (gingival crest) marks the
separation between the root and the crown. (Contributed by David A.
Fagan, The Colyer Institute, P. O. Box 26118, San Diego, CA) (CD Figure 5.7b)

Figure 6.7. Relationship between cell wall digestibility
and mean
retention time (MRT) of fiber by foregut and colon fermenters on a
grass hay diet. Red circles represent foregut fermenting ruminants and
camels; a) barasigha, b) eland, c) nilgae, d) wapiti, e) water buck, f)
gaur, g) giraffe, h) gemsbok, i) African buffalo, j) American bison, k)
dromedary camel, and l) bactrian camel. Blue circles represent colon
fermenting a) Grevy’s zebra, b) mountain zebra, c) plains zebra, d)
Asian tapir, e) American tapir, f) Asian wild ass, g) African elephant,
h) Asian elephant, i) black rhino, j) Indian rhino, and k) white rhino.
R2 = 0.66 for the ruminants and camels and 0.26 for colon fermenters.
Yellow triangles represent; (1) red kangaroos on an alfalfa diet,
river hippos on an (2) alfalfa hay or (3) grass diet, and (4) sloths on
a diet of Ceropia palmata
foliage. Data for ruminants, camels, hippos, and colon fermenters are
from Foose (1982). Data on red kangaroos are from Hume (1999) and data
on the three-toed sloth are from Foley et al. (1995) and Foley
(personal communication.) (CD Figure 7.7)
Table 7-5b (CD Table 8.6b)

Enzymatic
activity is designated as + (present), trace or 0 (absent). Results in
brackets indicate use of and alternate substrate. All data from adult
specimens. (from Vonk and Western 1984 plus perissodactyla data from
Roberts 1975)
Table
8.4
(CD Table 9.4)

Table 8.7a. (CD Table 9.7a)
* Absorption from cecum (or ceca) alone.
Dashes indicate absence of
information. Contributions of SCFA to
maintenance energy were estimated from the
rate of SCFA production by in vitro isotope dilution or measurements of
digesta flow. Total maintenance energy was either calculated as twice
the BMR or assumed to be equivalent to ad libitum digestible energy
intake in captive, nonreproducing, and adult animals. (From Stevens and
Hume 1995.)